USAspending.gov · Parent recipient

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.

According to USAspending.gov, Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s lifetime obligations place it in the lower tier of tracked federal contractors

Corpus rank
#4,053 of 5,000
Lifetime awards
$34.0M
UEI
NW6MYLMS2K38
Percentile · bottom quartile nationally
19th

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc. vs all tracked contractors by lifetime obligations

Where this recipient's cumulative award total sits among every tracked prime, USAspending.gov lifetime ledgers

$33,977,178 19th percentile higher than 19% of 5,000 contractors

Contractors, banded by lifetime obligation dollars

Each bar is a $50M-wide band; taller bars hold more contractors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USAspending.gov · 2026-09-12

Subscribe to award updates (RSS)

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc. federal award total

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc. is a tracked USAspending.gov prime recipient; this page reports its lifetime obligations across every award action filed under one recipient ID.

PlainFedContract reports USAspending.gov /recipient/ lifetime ledgers for Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.: cumulative prime obligations on this recipient ID, not a single fiscal year. Lifetime totals can exceed one year's national pool; do not read the scale bar as an annual share. Open linked agency or state breakdowns when present; see /methodology/#populations/.

Reading Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s Federal Contract Record

USAspending.gov's public ledger records Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s cumulative federal contract obligations at the parent recipient level.

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s lifetime obligations place it in the lower tier of tracked federal contractors, #4,053 of 5,000 tracked recipients, same order as the top-contractors rankings.

To see what makes up the header figures, read the largest awards, the year-by-year trend and the nearest peers below. See methodology.

How to read this obligation total (lifetime ledger, not annual spend)

This figure is a rolling aggregate of every prime-award action ever reported for this recipient ID, new awards, modifications, option exercises, and de-obligations all flow into the same total, so the dollar amount shown above is a lifetime ledger rather than an annual budget. Interpreting it as a single-year spend would overstate current activity; interpreting it as a guaranteed revenue stream would overstate commitment, because modifications can cut scope or scope can simply lapse unexercised. The parent classification also matters for how this record should be read: prime recipients hold the contract directly with a federal agency and are fully responsible for performance; parent-level rollups aggregate awards across subsidiaries, which can inflate totals for large conglomerates whose operating units compete separately. The UEI in the header is the post-2022 federal identifier that replaced the DUNS number, it persists across name changes, acquisitions, and reorganizations, making it the most reliable anchor for tracking this entity over time. For researchers, journalists, and procurement staff, the practical layer under this total is verification: USAspending.gov exposes every underlying transaction by award ID, so any totals on this page can be reconstructed action-by-action through the agency's advanced search. Contract amounts displayed here reflect obligations, money the government has committed, not outlays, which is cash actually disbursed, and the gap between obligation and outlay can span multiple fiscal years on multi-year contracts, so a large obligation total does not imply equivalent cash flow in any single period.

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s federal contractor value score

One verdict number from this portal's own compiled award data, benchmarked against the tracked contractor corpus: scale, recent momentum, and revenue consistency.

F 19/100
  • Contract scale F $33,977,178 Total tracked federal contract value
  • Recent momentum N/A N/A Most recent tracked year vs. the prior year
  • Revenue consistency N/A N/A Year-over-year variation across every tracked year

Higher scale, stronger recent momentum, and steadier year-over-year revenue all score higher. A dimension with too little tracked history for this recipient drops out and its weight redistributes across the rest -- it never silently lowers the score. Full method: federal contractor value score.

Lifetime total vs FY2024 complete national pool (scale only, not an annual share; bar=0) 0.0%

Source: USAspending.gov · U.S. Department of the Treasury

Nationwide similar contractors

Data-derived peers across the USAspending recipient extract: nearest lifetime obligation total and nearest represented-agency count. Not geography, name-group siblings, or recommendations.

Closest lifetime-obligation totals

Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s biggest awards

The 5 largest individual contract awards on file for this recipient, direct from USAspending.gov: not the lifetime aggregate above, but the actual awards behind it.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration $11.5M

SIMULATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER.

Award 80LARC25F0001 · 2024-12-01 to 2026-11-30

National Aeronautics and Space Administration $822.5K

IGF::OT::IGF OUR PHASE I WORK FOCUSED ON HOW IMPROVED INFORMATION FLOW BETWEEN ACTORS IN A FLIGHT DECK ENVIRONMENT CAN IMPROVE SAFETY PERFORMANCE. AN OPERATIONAL PROTOTYPE WAS DEVELOPED DEMONSTRATING HOW THE INTELLIGENT INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM (IIPS) WILL OPERATE IN ACTUAL ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS. FOR PHASE II, WE PROPOSE THE FOLLOWING OPERATING ENVIRONMENT EXTENSIONS FROM THE FLIGHT DECK ENVIRONMENT: NEXTGEN SCENARIOS EMPHASIZING INTERACTIONS WITH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS OPERATING IN FAST PACED, INCREASED VOLUME OF MANNED AND AUTONOMOUS TRAFFIC; UAV OPERATIONS EMPHASIZING INTRODUCTION OF UAVS INTO THE NAS, TRANSITION TO AUTONOMY AND FULLY AUTONOMOUS OPERATIONS; AND IIPS IN FLIGHT TRAINING ENVIRONMENTS BOTH SIMULATED AND AIRBORNE. WE ALSO PROPOSE AN EXTENSION TO THE MANNER IN WHICH CONDITIONS WERE DEVELOPED IN PHASE I. CONDITIONS WERE DEVELOPED USING POST ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS. THE ERROR CHAIN OF EVENTS WAS IDENTIFIED, INFORMATION NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE EVENT WAS IDENTIFIED, AND FINALLY, A CONDITION DEVELOPED THAT DETECTED THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOR A POSSIBLE SAFETY FAILURE SO THAT A NOTIFICATION COULD BE TRANSMITTED TO THE ACTOR WHO WOULD THEN TAKE THE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO BREAK THE ERROR CHAIN. THIS PARADIGM OF CONDITION DEVELOPMENT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS REACTIVE. WITH THE NAS MOVING INTO A STATE OF FLUX WITH THE INTEGRATION OF UAVS AND GENERAL INCREASED TRAFFIC VOLUME, REACTIVE SAFETY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STEADILY IMPROVING SAFETY RECORD OF AVIATION, A MORE PROACTIVE APPROACH MUST BE CONSIDERED. WE PROPOSE THE USE OF A CLASSICAL RULE-BASED EXPERT SYSTEM AND OTHER ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPROACHES THAT CAN MAKE INFERENCES OF POSSIBLE UNSAFE CONDITIONS USING A TEMPORAL KNOWLEDGE BASE POPULATED BY PROPOSITIONAL STATEMENTS GENERATED BY IIPS INFORMATION SOURCES.

Award NNX17CL03C · 2017-04-17 to 2020-09-27

National Aeronautics and Space Administration $740.9K

EO14042 SBIR PHASE II COLLABORATIVE SENSING AND MAPPING FOR IVA ROBOTS

Award 80NSSC22CA086 · 2022-05-05 to 2024-05-04

Department of Defense $135.4K

COMMERCIAL SOLUTIONS PEO DIGITAL

Award FA865219P0108 · 2019-03-06 to 2019-08-06

National Aeronautics and Space Administration $123.6K

TO BUILD ONLINE MAPS OF THE ISS USING "CO-SLAM". THE MAPS WOULD BE BUILT AND SHARED BETWEEN MULTIPLE ROBOTS, USING A CENTRAL SERVER. THE PROPOSAL IS TO EVALUATE CO-SLAM ALGORITHMS IN THE ASTROBEE SIMULATOR AND DEVELOP CON-OPS FOR OPERATION ON THE ISS

Award 80NSSC21C0288 · 2021-05-19 to 2021-11-19

Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only. Contract amounts are aggregated from USAspending.gov and may not reflect the most current data. Do not use this data for business decisions without verifying with official sources.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Metis Technology Solutions, Inc. rank among tracked federal contractors?

Tracked recipients are ordered by USAspending.gov lifetime obligation totals, the same sort as the top-contractors rankings; Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s position is the Corpus rank in the header at the top of this page.

How much has Metis Technology Solutions, Inc. received in federal contracts?

The lifetime total is the Lifetime awards figure in the header at the top of this page. It sums every prime-award action reported under this recipient ID on USAspending.gov, modifications included, so it is a running ledger rather than one year's spending.

What is the UEI for Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.?

The Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) is shown in the header stat rail above; it is recorded at the parent recipient level.

Where does Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.'s contract data come from?

All contract data for Metis Technology Solutions, Inc. is sourced from USAspending.gov prime-award records. No agency- or state-level breakdown is on file for this contractor.

How this record relates to the rest of the data

USAspending publishes 2 separate recipient records under the name Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.. This page covers one of them – the parent-level record registered as UEI NW6MYLMS2K38, 2nd largest of the group by lifetime obligations. The same registration also appears at the other recipient level.

Each record carries its own lifetime total as published by the source. Those totals overlap across recipient levels without a stated rule, so they are separate attributions and must not be added together to reach a company-wide figure.

By lifetime obligations this record sits just below Chartwell Rx LLC ($34.0M) and just above Tcg Inc ($34.0M), the nearest recipients by size that do not share its name.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Compiled from USAspending.gov by the PlainFedContract editorial process.

Every figure on PlainFedContract is rendered directly from USAspending.gov federal contract data, no number is typed in by an editor. Contractor figures are computed directly from USAspending.gov data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a correction.