USAspending.gov · P recipient
ENERSYS
According to USAspending.gov, ENERSYS's obligation total is modest relative to the broader contractor pool
- Corpus rank
- #3,457 of 5,000
- Lifetime awards
- $40.3M
- UEI
- CJ1UM3JBSFC5
- Percentile
- 31st
ENERSYS vs all tracked contractors by lifetime obligations
Where this recipient's cumulative award total sits among every tracked prime, USAspending.gov lifetime ledgers
$40,310,151 31st percentile higher than 31% of 5,000 contractors
Contractors, banded by lifetime obligation dollars
Each bar is a $50M-wide band; taller bars hold more contractors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USAspending.gov · 2026-08-14
ENERSYS federal award total
ENERSYS ranks #3,457 of 5,000 tracked recipients by lifetime prime obligations.
PlainFedContract reports USAspending.gov /recipient/ lifetime ledgers for ENERSYS: cumulative prime obligations on this recipient ID, not a single fiscal year. Lifetime totals can exceed one year's national pool; do not read the scale bar as an annual share. Open linked agency or state breakdowns when present; see /methodology/#populations/.
Reading ENERSYS's Federal Contract Record
USAspending.gov records place ENERSYS at $40.3M (below the median) in cumulative federal contract obligations, tied to Unique Entity Identifier CJ1UM3JBSFC5 at the P recipient level.
ENERSYS's obligation total is modest relative to the broader contractor pool, 31st percentile of 5,000 tracked recipients (#3,457 of 5,000), same order as the top-contractors rankings.
Lifetime totals can exceed one year's national pool; the scale bar below is scale-only, not an annual share. See methodology.
How to read this obligation total (lifetime ledger, not annual spend)
This figure is a rolling aggregate of every prime-award action ever reported for this recipient ID, new awards, modifications, option exercises, and de-obligations all flow into the same total, so the dollar amount shown above is a lifetime ledger rather than an annual budget. Interpreting it as a single-year spend would overstate current activity; interpreting it as a guaranteed revenue stream would overstate commitment, because modifications can cut scope or scope can simply lapse unexercised. The P classification also matters for how this record should be read: prime recipients hold the contract directly with a federal agency and are fully responsible for performance; parent-level rollups aggregate awards across subsidiaries, which can inflate totals for large conglomerates whose operating units compete separately. The UEI CJ1UM3JBSFC5 is the post-2022 federal identifier that replaced the DUNS number, it persists across name changes, acquisitions, and reorganizations, making it the most reliable anchor for tracking this entity over time. For researchers, journalists, and procurement staff, the practical layer under this total is verification: USAspending.gov exposes every underlying transaction by award ID, so any totals on this page can be reconstructed action-by-action through the agency's advanced search. Contract amounts displayed here reflect obligations, money the government has committed, not outlays, which is cash actually disbursed, and the gap between obligation and outlay can span multiple fiscal years on multi-year contracts, so a large obligation total does not imply equivalent cash flow in any single period.
ENERSYS's federal contractor value score
One verdict number from this portal's own compiled award data, benchmarked against the tracked contractor corpus: scale, recent momentum, and revenue consistency.
- Contract scale F $40,310,151 Total tracked federal contract value
- Recent momentum N/A N/A Most recent tracked year vs. the prior year
- Revenue consistency N/A N/A Year-over-year variation across every tracked year
Higher scale, stronger recent momentum, and steadier year-over-year revenue all score higher. A dimension with too little tracked history for this recipient drops out and its weight redistributes across the rest -- it never silently lowers the score. Full method: federal contractor value score.
Source: USAspending.gov · U.S. Department of the Treasury
Nationwide similar contractors
Data-derived peers across the USAspending recipient extract: nearest lifetime obligation total and nearest represented-agency count. Not geography, name-group siblings, or recommendations.
Closest lifetime-obligation totals
- Enersys Energy Products Inc. $40.3M
- Abbott Laboratories $40.3M
- Constellation Newenergy, Inc. $40.3M
- I Tech Ag LLC $40.3M
- I Tech Ag LLC $40.3M
- Bristol Building Constructors LLC $40.3M
Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only. Contract amounts are aggregated from USAspending.gov and may not reflect the most current data. Do not use this data for business decisions without verifying with official sources.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does ENERSYS rank among tracked federal contractors?
According to USAspending.gov lifetime obligation totals, ENERSYS ranks #3,457 of 5,000 tracked recipients by total award amount, the same sort as the top-contractors rankings.
How much has ENERSYS received in federal contracts?
ENERSYS has received a total of $40.3M in federal contract awards based on USAspending.gov data.
What is the UEI for ENERSYS?
The Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) for ENERSYS is CJ1UM3JBSFC5, recorded at the P recipient level.
Where does ENERSYS's contract data come from?
All contract data for ENERSYS is sourced from USAspending.gov. No agency- or state-level breakdown is on file for this contractor.
How this record relates to the rest of the data
This name appears once in the tracked recipient set, so the parent-level record on this page is the only USAspending recipient record carrying it.
By lifetime obligations this record sits just below Constellation Newenergy, Inc. ($40.3M) and just above Enersys Energy Products Inc. ($40.3M), the nearest recipients by size that do not share its name.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainFedContract is rendered directly from USAspending.gov federal contract data, no number is typed in by an editor. Contractor figures are computed directly from USAspending.gov data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a correction.