USAspending.gov · P recipient
Chickasaw Nation
According to USAspending.gov, Chickasaw Nation ranks above the midpoint of tracked federal contractors by obligation volume
- Corpus rank
- #1,697 of 5,000
- Lifetime awards
- $89.4M
- UEI
- KS8HLVMJEMW9
- Percentile
- 66th
Chickasaw Nation vs all tracked contractors by lifetime obligations
Where this recipient's cumulative award total sits among every tracked prime, USAspending.gov lifetime ledgers
$89,409,565 Top 34% higher than 66% of 5,000 contractors
Contractors, banded by lifetime obligation dollars
Each bar is a $50M-wide band; taller bars hold more contractors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USAspending.gov · 2026-08-14
Chickasaw Nation federal award total
Chickasaw Nation ranks #1,697 of 5,000 tracked recipients by lifetime prime obligations.
PlainFedContract reports USAspending.gov /recipient/ lifetime ledgers for Chickasaw Nation: cumulative prime obligations on this recipient ID, not a single fiscal year. Lifetime totals can exceed one year's national pool; do not read the scale bar as an annual share. Open linked agency or state breakdowns when present; see /methodology/#populations/.
Reading Chickasaw Nation's Federal Contract Record
USAspending.gov records place Chickasaw Nation at $89.4M (above the median) in cumulative federal contract obligations, tied to Unique Entity Identifier KS8HLVMJEMW9 at the P recipient level.
Chickasaw Nation ranks above the midpoint of tracked federal contractors by obligation volume, 66th percentile of 5,000 tracked recipients (#1,697 of 5,000), same order as the top-contractors rankings.
Lifetime totals can exceed one year's national pool; the scale bar below is scale-only, not an annual share. See methodology.
How to read this obligation total (lifetime ledger, not annual spend)
This figure is a rolling aggregate of every prime-award action ever reported for this recipient ID, new awards, modifications, option exercises, and de-obligations all flow into the same total, so the dollar amount shown above is a lifetime ledger rather than an annual budget. Interpreting it as a single-year spend would overstate current activity; interpreting it as a guaranteed revenue stream would overstate commitment, because modifications can cut scope or scope can simply lapse unexercised. The P classification also matters for how this record should be read: prime recipients hold the contract directly with a federal agency and are fully responsible for performance; parent-level rollups aggregate awards across subsidiaries, which can inflate totals for large conglomerates whose operating units compete separately. The UEI KS8HLVMJEMW9 is the post-2022 federal identifier that replaced the DUNS number, it persists across name changes, acquisitions, and reorganizations, making it the most reliable anchor for tracking this entity over time. For researchers, journalists, and procurement staff, the practical layer under this total is verification: USAspending.gov exposes every underlying transaction by award ID, so any totals on this page can be reconstructed action-by-action through the agency's advanced search. Contract amounts displayed here reflect obligations, money the government has committed, not outlays, which is cash actually disbursed, and the gap between obligation and outlay can span multiple fiscal years on multi-year contracts, so a large obligation total does not imply equivalent cash flow in any single period.
Chickasaw Nation's federal contractor value score
One verdict number from this portal's own compiled award data, benchmarked against the tracked contractor corpus: scale, recent momentum, and revenue consistency.
- Contract scale C+ $89,409,565 Total tracked federal contract value
- Recent momentum N/A N/A Most recent tracked year vs. the prior year
- Revenue consistency N/A N/A Year-over-year variation across every tracked year
Higher scale, stronger recent momentum, and steadier year-over-year revenue all score higher. A dimension with too little tracked history for this recipient drops out and its weight redistributes across the rest -- it never silently lowers the score. Full method: federal contractor value score.
Source: USAspending.gov · U.S. Department of the Treasury
Nationwide similar contractors
Data-derived peers across the USAspending recipient extract: nearest lifetime obligation total and nearest represented-agency count. Not geography, name-group siblings, or recommendations.
Closest lifetime-obligation totals
- L3harris Technologies, Inc. $89.4M
- Bradley Technologies Inc $89.5M
- Bradley Technologies Inc $89.5M
- Briston Construction LLC $89.3M
- Briston Construction, LLC $89.3M
- Vendtech-Sgi LLC $89.2M
Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only. Contract amounts are aggregated from USAspending.gov and may not reflect the most current data. Do not use this data for business decisions without verifying with official sources.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Chickasaw Nation rank among tracked federal contractors?
According to USAspending.gov lifetime obligation totals, Chickasaw Nation ranks #1,697 of 5,000 tracked recipients by total award amount, the same sort as the top-contractors rankings.
How much has Chickasaw Nation received in federal contracts?
Chickasaw Nation has received a total of $89.4M in federal contract awards based on USAspending.gov data.
What is the UEI for Chickasaw Nation?
The Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) for Chickasaw Nation is KS8HLVMJEMW9, recorded at the P recipient level.
Where does Chickasaw Nation's contract data come from?
All contract data for Chickasaw Nation is sourced from USAspending.gov. No agency- or state-level breakdown is on file for this contractor.
How this record relates to the rest of the data
This name appears once in the tracked recipient set, so the parent-level record on this page is the only USAspending recipient record carrying it.
By lifetime obligations this record sits just below Bradley Technologies Inc ($89.5M) and just above L3harris Technologies, Inc. ($89.4M), the nearest recipients by size that do not share its name.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainFedContract is rendered directly from USAspending.gov federal contract data, no number is typed in by an editor. Contractor figures are computed directly from USAspending.gov data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a correction.